Discharging to the Street: When Patients Refuse Medically Safer Options

 

Georgina D. Campelia, James N. Kirkpatrick, Patsy D. Treece, Jamie L. Shirley, and Denise M. Dudzinski

 

The ethical obligation to provide a reasonably safe discharge option  from the inpatient setting  is often confounded by the context of homelessness. Living without the security of stable housing is a known determinant of poor health, often complicating the safety of discharge and causing unnecessary readmission. But clinicians do not have significant control over unjust distributions of resources or inadequate societal investment in social services. While physicians may stretch inpatient stays beyond acute care need in the interest of their patients who are experiencing homelessness, they must also consider the  implications of using an  inpatient hospital  bed for someone without the attendant level of medical need. Caring for patients in an inpatient setting when they no longer require acute care means fewer beds for acute care patients. And when a patient who is experiencing homelessness declines a medically safer option such as a skilled nursing facility, then clinicians may be faced with the sole option of discharge to the street, which raises troubling questions of nonmaleficence and social justice. Here we investigate the different forms of injustice that play out when patients are discharged to the street, and offer a map of the interwoven ethical responsibilities of clinicians, hospitals, and skilled nursing facilities.

 

 

Read the full text

 

Institutional Subscribers

 

Individual Subscribers

 

Nonsubscriberspurchase a .pdf of the article